Positive net assets maintained and growing over the decade, from $25,164 in 2012 to $60,159 in 2021.
Spending Breakdown
How Physicians For Social Responsibility Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Physicians For Social Responsibility Inc
Is Physicians For Social Responsibility Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Physicians For Social Responsibility Inc (EIN: 10383549) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 0 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Physicians For Social Responsibility Inc a good charity to donate to?
Physicians For Social Responsibility Inc has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Physicians For Social Responsibility Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Physicians For Social Responsibility Inc is 10383549. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Physicians For Social Responsibility Inc spend its money?
Physicians For Social Responsibility Inc allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Physicians For Social Responsibility Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Physicians For Social Responsibility Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 10383549 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Physicians For Social Responsibility Inc appears to be a small, consistently operating nonprofit with modest financial activity. Over the past decade, its annual revenue has fluctuated, ranging from a low of $29,087 in 2012 to a high of $90,140 in 2015. The organization generally maintains a positive net asset position, with assets growing from $25,164 in 2012 to $60,159 in 2021, and consistently reports zero liabilities, indicating a healthy balance sheet free of debt.
Spending efficiency is difficult to precisely determine without a detailed functional expense breakdown (program, administrative, fundraising) from the provided data. However, the organization's expenses have generally tracked its revenue, suggesting a lean operation. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings indicates a volunteer-led or very low-overhead leadership structure, which can be a positive sign for donor confidence. The absence of liabilities further reinforces its financial stability.
Transparency is good given the consistent filing of IRS Form 990s over the past decade. The publicly available data allows for an overview of its financial trends, and the lack of officer compensation is a transparent indicator of how resources are managed at the top. However, without more granular expense data, a full assessment of spending efficiency across program, administrative, and fundraising categories is limited.