Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation, indicating efficient use of funds for executive salaries.
Long history of IRS 990 filings (13 filings), demonstrating transparency and compliance.
Very low or zero reported liabilities across most filing periods, indicating good financial management of debt.
Spending Breakdown
How Pi Beta Phi Fraternity allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Pi Beta Phi Fraternity
Is Pi Beta Phi Fraternity a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Pi Beta Phi Fraternity (EIN: 205767321) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Pi Beta Phi Fraternity a good charity to donate to?
Pi Beta Phi Fraternity has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $96K. Assets: $93K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Pi Beta Phi Fraternity?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Pi Beta Phi Fraternity is 205767321. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Pi Beta Phi Fraternity spend its money?
Pi Beta Phi Fraternity allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Pi Beta Phi Fraternity's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Pi Beta Phi Fraternity's tax-exempt status using EIN 205767321 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Pi Beta Phi Fraternity demonstrates a consistent operational pattern with revenues generally fluctuating around the $100,000 mark, though there was a notable dip in 2021 to $12,693. The organization's assets have shown a gradual decline from a high of $158,418 in 2016 to $101,635 in 2023, indicating a potential draw on reserves or a lack of significant asset growth. Expenses have often exceeded revenue, as seen in 2023 ($79,674 expenses vs. $73,724 revenue) and 2022 ($87,425 expenses vs. $86,238 revenue), suggesting a reliance on prior year surpluses or other funding sources to cover operational costs. The organization consistently reports 0% officer compensation, which is a positive indicator for minimizing administrative overhead related to executive pay.
While the provided data does not offer a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, the consistent reporting of zero officer compensation suggests a lean approach to executive salaries. The organization's financial health appears stable but not robust, with assets declining over time and expenses frequently outpacing revenue. The lack of detailed expense categories in the provided summary makes a precise assessment of spending efficiency challenging, but the overall financial trend suggests careful management is needed to maintain long-term sustainability.
Transparency is generally good given the consistent filing of IRS Form 990s over many years. However, without a breakdown of how expenses are allocated across programs, administration, and fundraising, it's difficult to fully assess the efficiency of their spending. The consistent reporting of liabilities as very low or zero is a positive sign of financial prudence.