Quick charity verification for Piermont Historical Society (EIN: 20352334)
Verdict: Piermont Historical Society shows mixed signals
60/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
2Red Flags
2Strengths
Red Flags
Zero reported revenue and assets in the latest filing, potentially indicating dormancy or cessation of activities.
Extremely low financial activity across all reported periods, making it difficult to assess ongoing operational viability.
Strengths
Consistent 0% officer compensation, indicating a volunteer-driven model.
Low overhead due to minimal financial activity.
Spending Breakdown
How Piermont Historical Society allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
100%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
0%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Piermont Historical Society
Is Piermont Historical Society a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Piermont Historical Society (EIN: 20352334) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 60/100. 2 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Piermont Historical Society a good charity to donate to?
Piermont Historical Society has a Mission Score of 60/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Piermont Historical Society?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Piermont Historical Society is 20352334. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Piermont Historical Society spend its money?
Piermont Historical Society allocates 100% to programs, 0% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Piermont Historical Society's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Piermont Historical Society's tax-exempt status using EIN 20352334 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Piermont Historical Society appears to be a very small, volunteer-run organization with minimal financial activity. Their latest filing shows $0 in both revenue and assets, indicating either dormancy or that their financial activities are extremely limited and potentially handled outside of formal reporting thresholds for larger organizations. The historical filings show very low revenue, peaking at $705 in 2012, and similarly low expenses. This suggests a grassroots operation with little to no paid staff and a reliance on in-kind contributions or very small-scale activities. Given the lack of significant financial transactions, assessing traditional financial health metrics like spending efficiency is challenging, as there's little to analyze. Transparency is adequate for an organization of this size, with filings available, but the lack of activity means there isn't much to disclose beyond basic organizational existence.