Is Pinal Gila Councils Senior Foundation Legit?

Quick charity verification for Pinal Gila Councils Senior Foundation (EIN: 201449241)

Verdict: Pinal Gila Councils Senior Foundation appears trustworthy

75/100Mission Score
$223KRevenue
$3.3MAssets
2Red Flags
4Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

Spending Breakdown

How Pinal Gila Councils Senior Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Pinal Gila Councils Senior Foundation

Is Pinal Gila Councils Senior Foundation a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Pinal Gila Councils Senior Foundation (EIN: 201449241) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.

Is Pinal Gila Councils Senior Foundation a good charity to donate to?

Pinal Gila Councils Senior Foundation has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $223K. Assets: $3.3M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Pinal Gila Councils Senior Foundation?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Pinal Gila Councils Senior Foundation is 201449241. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Pinal Gila Councils Senior Foundation spend its money?

Pinal Gila Councils Senior Foundation allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Pinal Gila Councils Senior Foundation's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Pinal Gila Councils Senior Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 201449241 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

Pinal Gila Councils Senior Foundation demonstrates a stable financial position with significant assets relative to its revenue. With $3,347,758 in assets and latest reported revenue of $223,351, the organization appears to have a strong balance sheet. However, a detailed breakdown of expenses is not provided in the summary data, making it difficult to fully assess spending efficiency. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings indicates a commitment to minimizing administrative overhead related to executive pay, which is a positive sign for donor confidence. The organization's revenue has fluctuated over the years, with a notable spike in 2019 ($838,112), but has generally remained in the $50,000-$200,000 range in recent periods. The consistent growth in assets, from $1,945,551 in 2016 to over $3.3 million currently, suggests effective asset management or significant non-operating income/contributions. Without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, a comprehensive assessment of spending efficiency is challenging. The provided data only shows total expenses, which have been consistently lower than revenue in most recent years, leading to asset growth. For example, in 202406, revenue was $66,229 against expenses of $15,149, and in 202306, revenue was $58,244 against expenses of $20,500. This suggests that a significant portion of revenue is not being spent annually, contributing to asset accumulation. While asset growth can be a strength, it also raises questions about the immediate deployment of funds for programmatic activities if the primary mission involves direct service delivery. The lack of officer compensation is a strong indicator of transparency and efficient use of funds in that specific area. To fully evaluate the organization's financial health and spending efficiency, more granular expense data would be necessary. Specifically, understanding the proportion of expenses dedicated to direct program services versus administrative and fundraising costs is crucial. The consistent asset growth, coupled with relatively low annual expenses compared to assets, suggests a conservative financial approach or a focus on long-term endowment building. The organization's transparency regarding executive compensation is excellent, but further transparency on expense allocation would enhance its overall financial assessment.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages