Quick charity verification for Project Purr Br (EIN: 10968352)
Verdict: Project Purr Br shows mixed signals
40/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
3Red Flags
2Strengths
Red Flags
Latest filing shows $0 revenue and $0 assets, indicating potential inactivity or dissolution.
Significant and consistent decline in revenue from $229,705 in 2012 to $0 in the latest period.
Lack of detailed expense breakdown in available data makes it difficult to fully assess spending efficiency.
Strengths
Consistently reported 0% officer compensation, indicating no salaries paid to executives from organizational funds.
Maintained positive net assets in most active years, peaking at $159,099 in 2014.
Spending Breakdown
How Project Purr Br allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Project Purr Br
Is Project Purr Br a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Project Purr Br (EIN: 10968352) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 40/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Project Purr Br a good charity to donate to?
Project Purr Br has a Mission Score of 40/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Project Purr Br?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Project Purr Br is 10968352. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Project Purr Br spend its money?
Project Purr Br allocates 80% to programs, 10% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Project Purr Br's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Project Purr Br's tax-exempt status using EIN 10968352 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Project Purr Br has experienced a significant decline in revenue, from a high of $229,705 in 2012 to $139,052 in 2014, and ultimately reporting $0 in the latest period. This trend raises concerns about the organization's financial sustainability and operational status. While the organization consistently reported zero officer compensation across all available filings, which can be a positive indicator of resource allocation, the complete lack of revenue and assets in the latest period suggests the organization may no longer be actively operating or has undergone a significant change in its financial reporting. The available data does not provide a detailed breakdown of expenses, making it difficult to fully assess spending efficiency beyond the overall revenue and expense figures. The consistent reporting of assets in previous years, peaking at $159,099 in 2014, followed by a complete absence in the latest filing, further complicates a clear understanding of its current financial health and transparency.