Quick charity verification for Prp Association Inc (EIN: 20401967)
Verdict: Prp Association Inc shows mixed signals
65/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
2Red Flags
2Strengths
Red Flags
Lack of recent financial activity (zero revenue/assets in latest filing)
Outdated substantial financial data (last active filing from 2011)
Strengths
No reported officer compensation in 2011 filing
Operated with a surplus in 2011 ($21,023 revenue vs. $13,314 expenses)
Spending Breakdown
How Prp Association Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
100%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
0%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Prp Association Inc
Is Prp Association Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Prp Association Inc (EIN: 20401967) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 2 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Prp Association Inc a good charity to donate to?
Prp Association Inc has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Prp Association Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Prp Association Inc is 20401967. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Prp Association Inc spend its money?
Prp Association Inc allocates 100% to programs, 0% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Prp Association Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Prp Association Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 20401967 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Prp Association Inc appears to be a very small organization, and its financial data from the 2011 fiscal period shows minimal activity. With reported revenue of $21,023 and expenses of $13,314, the organization operated with a surplus. The most recent filing indicates zero revenue and zero assets, suggesting either dormancy or a significant change in operations since 2011. The lack of more recent financial data makes a comprehensive assessment of current financial health challenging.
Based on the 2011 data, the organization demonstrated efficient spending with no reported officer compensation, indicating that all expenses were likely directed towards program activities or essential administrative functions. However, the absence of detailed expense breakdowns in the provided data limits a precise analysis of spending efficiency. Transparency is also limited due to the age of the most substantial financial filing and the lack of more recent detailed information.