Reported $0 revenue and assets in the latest filing (202309) after years of active financial reporting, raising questions about current operations or data accuracy.
NTEE code is unknown, which can hinder understanding the organization's specific programmatic focus and comparing it to peers.
Strengths
Consistently reports 0% officer compensation across all available filings, indicating efficient use of funds not directed towards executive salaries.
Maintained positive net assets in most recent active periods (e.g., $37,506 in 202309, $56,620 in 202209, $8,645 in 202009, excluding the $0 report).
Spending Breakdown
How Psi Upsilon Fraternity allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Psi Upsilon Fraternity
Is Psi Upsilon Fraternity a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Psi Upsilon Fraternity (EIN: 20180995) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 60/100. 2 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Psi Upsilon Fraternity a good charity to donate to?
Psi Upsilon Fraternity has a Mission Score of 60/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Psi Upsilon Fraternity?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Psi Upsilon Fraternity is 20180995. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Psi Upsilon Fraternity spend its money?
Psi Upsilon Fraternity allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Psi Upsilon Fraternity's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Psi Upsilon Fraternity's tax-exempt status using EIN 20180995 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Psi Upsilon Fraternity demonstrates a fluctuating financial picture over its filing history. While recent years show positive net assets, the organization reported $0 in both revenue and assets for its latest period, which is a significant discrepancy compared to previous filings. This abrupt change warrants further investigation to understand the current operational status and financial health. The organization consistently reports 0% officer compensation, which is a positive indicator of resource allocation directly to its mission or operational needs, rather than executive salaries. However, the lack of detailed expense breakdowns in the provided data makes a precise assessment of spending efficiency challenging beyond the high-level revenue and expense figures. The absence of liabilities in most recent filings suggests a healthy balance sheet in those periods, but the overall financial stability is questionable given the latest $0 report.