Zero reported liabilities across all periods, indicating a healthy balance sheet.
0% officer compensation reported, suggesting volunteer leadership and efficient use of funds for executive roles.
Significant revenue generation in some periods (e.g., $67,485 in 2020) demonstrating past capacity for fundraising.
Spending Breakdown
How Pta Idaho Congress allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Pta Idaho Congress
Is Pta Idaho Congress a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Pta Idaho Congress (EIN: 205516408) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Pta Idaho Congress a good charity to donate to?
Pta Idaho Congress has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Pta Idaho Congress?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Pta Idaho Congress is 205516408. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Pta Idaho Congress spend its money?
Pta Idaho Congress allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Pta Idaho Congress's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Pta Idaho Congress's tax-exempt status using EIN 205516408 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
PTA Idaho Congress demonstrates fluctuating financial activity over the past several years. While the organization reported $0 in both revenue and assets in its latest filing, this appears to be an anomaly given its historical data. For instance, in 2020, it reported revenue of $67,485 and assets of $45,407. The organization consistently reports zero liabilities, indicating a healthy balance sheet without debt. However, the lack of detailed expense breakdowns in the provided data makes a precise assessment of spending efficiency challenging. The organization's consistent filing of IRS Form 990s, even with periods of minimal activity, suggests a commitment to basic transparency requirements.
Without specific program, administrative, and fundraising expense figures, it's difficult to fully evaluate spending efficiency. However, the significant drop to $0 in revenue and assets in the latest period, following a period of substantial activity in 2020, warrants further investigation to understand the operational status of the organization. The historical data shows periods where expenses exceeded revenue (e.g., 2015 and 2013), which could indicate reliance on prior year reserves or one-time funding, but also periods of strong net income (e.g., 2020 and 2012).
The organization's transparency is generally adequate through its consistent 990 filings, but the absence of detailed expense categories prevents a deeper analysis of how funds are allocated across its mission, administration, and fundraising efforts. The lack of officer compensation reported across all periods is a positive indicator for donor confidence regarding executive pay.