Expenses consistently lower than revenue in most periods, leading to positive net assets.
0% reported officer compensation across all filings, suggesting efficient executive cost management or volunteer leadership.
Spending Breakdown
How Red Crane Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Red Crane Foundation
Is Red Crane Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Red Crane Foundation (EIN: 133632753) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Red Crane Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Red Crane Foundation has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $31.1M. Assets: $65.7M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Red Crane Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Red Crane Foundation is 133632753. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Red Crane Foundation spend its money?
Red Crane Foundation allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Red Crane Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Red Crane Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 133632753 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Red Crane Foundation demonstrates a generally healthy financial position with substantial assets and a history of positive net revenue. Over the past three years (2021-2023), the organization has consistently maintained low liabilities, often reported as just $1, indicating strong financial management and minimal debt burden. Revenue has fluctuated significantly, peaking at $34,466,458 in 2021, but the organization has consistently managed to keep expenses well below revenue in most periods, leading to asset growth from $33,157,222 in 2012 to $60,406,497 in 2023. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings suggests either a fully volunteer-led executive team or that executive compensation is not reported in this specific field, which could warrant further investigation for complete transparency. The lack of NTEE code information makes it difficult to benchmark spending efficiency against similar organizations, but the overall financial health appears robust.
While the organization's financial health is strong, the absence of detailed expense breakdowns (program, administrative, fundraising) in the provided data limits a thorough assessment of spending efficiency. The consistent growth in assets, coupled with generally lower expenses relative to revenue, indicates effective resource accumulation. However, without a clear picture of how expenses are allocated, it's challenging to fully evaluate how efficiently funds are being directed towards programmatic activities versus overhead. The organization's transparency regarding executive compensation, showing 0% officer compensation, is notable, though it might also indicate a need for more granular detail on how leadership is compensated if not through direct officer pay.