Extremely low liabilities across all reported periods, indicating sound financial management and minimal debt.
Long history of IRS 990 filings (10 filings) demonstrates consistent reporting and transparency.
Spending Breakdown
How Richard M Allen Charitable Trust U D 12 23 85 M B allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Richard M Allen Charitable Trust U D 12 23 85 M B
Is Richard M Allen Charitable Trust U D 12 23 85 M B a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Richard M Allen Charitable Trust U D 12 23 85 M B (EIN: 136868370) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Richard M Allen Charitable Trust U D 12 23 85 M B a good charity to donate to?
Richard M Allen Charitable Trust U D 12 23 85 M B has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $1.1M. Assets: $3.2M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Richard M Allen Charitable Trust U D 12 23 85 M B?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Richard M Allen Charitable Trust U D 12 23 85 M B is 136868370. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Richard M Allen Charitable Trust U D 12 23 85 M B spend its money?
Richard M Allen Charitable Trust U D 12 23 85 M B allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Richard M Allen Charitable Trust U D 12 23 85 M B's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Richard M Allen Charitable Trust U D 12 23 85 M B's tax-exempt status using EIN 136868370 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Richard M Allen Charitable Trust U D 12 23 85 M B demonstrates strong financial health with consistently growing assets and revenues over the past decade. The organization's assets have grown from $1,071,101 in 2011 to $3,347,606 in 2023, while revenue has seen significant fluctuations but generally an upward trend, reaching $856,387 in 2023. A key indicator of efficiency is the low expense ratio relative to revenue; for example, in 2023, expenses were $217,327 against $856,387 in revenue, suggesting a substantial portion of income is retained or used for program services. The trust's liabilities have remained very low, often $1 or $0, indicating sound financial management and minimal debt burden.
Spending efficiency appears high, as total expenses are consistently a small fraction of total revenue. For instance, in 2022, expenses were only $89,348 compared to $538,424 in revenue. The absence of reported officer compensation across all filings suggests that administrative costs related to executive salaries are non-existent, which is a positive for donor confidence. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses into program, administrative, and fundraising categories in the provided data, a precise assessment of spending efficiency across these areas is challenging. The NTEE code being 'Unknown' also limits the ability to benchmark against similar organizations.
Transparency is generally good given the availability of 10 years of IRS 990 filings. The consistent reporting of zero officer compensation is a strong point for transparency regarding executive pay. However, the lack of detailed expense categorization within the provided summary data for program, administrative, and fundraising spending makes it difficult for external observers to fully understand how funds are allocated. To enhance transparency further, a more granular breakdown of expenses would be beneficial.