Quick charity verification for Rlc Foundation (EIN: 208549324)
Verdict: Rlc Foundation appears trustworthy
70/100Mission Score
$7KRevenue
$7KAssets
2Red Flags
3Strengths
Red Flags
Expenses exceeded revenue in the most recent filing (202312: Revenue=$6,005, Expenses=$7,215)
Small and fluctuating revenue base, making long-term planning challenging
Strengths
Consistent 0% officer compensation across all reported periods, indicating efficient use of funds
Long history of consistent IRS 990 filings, demonstrating transparency
Assets consistently exceed liabilities, indicating a healthy balance sheet for its size
Spending Breakdown
How Rlc Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Rlc Foundation
Is Rlc Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Rlc Foundation (EIN: 208549324) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Rlc Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Rlc Foundation has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $7K. Assets: $7K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Rlc Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Rlc Foundation is 208549324. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Rlc Foundation spend its money?
Rlc Foundation allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Rlc Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Rlc Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 208549324 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Rlc Foundation operates on a very small scale, with recent annual revenues fluctuating between $6,005 and $11,501. Its financial health appears stable but modest, with assets consistently exceeding liabilities (which are typically $1 or $0). The organization has maintained positive net assets over its filing history, indicating it is not operating at a significant deficit. However, the 202312 period showed expenses ($7,215) exceeding revenue ($6,005), leading to a slight decrease in assets from the previous year. This suggests a need for careful financial management to avoid sustained operational losses.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which are not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent lack of officer compensation (0% in all reported periods) is a positive indicator of efficient use of funds, as it suggests a volunteer-driven or very lean operational model. Given the small scale, a significant portion of expenses is likely directed towards its mission, but without specific data, this remains an assumption.
Transparency is generally good through its consistent IRS 990 filings over a decade. The organization's consistent reporting, even with minimal financial activity, demonstrates a commitment to public accountability. However, the lack of detailed expense categories in the provided summary limits a deeper analysis of how funds are allocated between programs, administration, and fundraising. For an organization of this size, detailed financial statements beyond the 990 summary would offer greater insight into its operational efficiency and impact.