Expenses generally align closely with revenue, suggesting efficient operations.
Spending Breakdown
How Road Runners Club Of America allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Road Runners Club Of America
Is Road Runners Club Of America a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Road Runners Club Of America (EIN: 20427572) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 1 red flag identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Road Runners Club Of America a good charity to donate to?
Road Runners Club Of America has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $72K. Assets: $110K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Road Runners Club Of America?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Road Runners Club Of America is 20427572. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Road Runners Club Of America spend its money?
Road Runners Club Of America allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Road Runners Club Of America's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Road Runners Club Of America's tax-exempt status using EIN 20427572 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Road Runners Club Of America demonstrates consistent financial activity, with revenues and expenses generally in close alignment over the past decade. For instance, in 2023, revenue was $61,466 against expenses of $60,985, indicating a break-even operational model. The organization's assets have remained relatively stable, hovering around $90,000 to $110,000, with current assets at $109,587. This suggests a conservative approach to financial management, maintaining a modest reserve without significant growth in net assets.
Spending efficiency appears to be a focus, as the organization consistently operates with minimal liabilities, often reporting $0. This indicates a strong ability to cover its obligations. The absence of reported officer compensation across all filings is a significant positive for transparency and efficiency, suggesting a volunteer-driven leadership structure. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses into program, administrative, and fundraising categories, a precise assessment of spending efficiency is limited.
Overall, the organization appears financially stable for its size, operating on a lean budget with a clear commitment to its mission, as evidenced by the lack of executive compensation. While more granular expense data would enhance transparency, the consistent financial reporting and minimal liabilities are positive indicators.