How Robert Clay Liddell Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Robert Clay Liddell Foundation
Is Robert Clay Liddell Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Robert Clay Liddell Foundation (EIN: 200420550) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 90/100. 1 red flag identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Robert Clay Liddell Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Robert Clay Liddell Foundation has a Mission Score of 90/100. Revenue: $601K. Assets: $1.3M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Robert Clay Liddell Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Robert Clay Liddell Foundation is 200420550. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Robert Clay Liddell Foundation spend its money?
Robert Clay Liddell Foundation allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Robert Clay Liddell Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Robert Clay Liddell Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 200420550 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Robert Clay Liddell Foundation demonstrates a generally healthy financial position with consistent asset growth over the past few years, reaching $1,306,389 in its latest filing. Revenue has fluctuated significantly, from a high of $1,585,354 in 2013 to $600,510 in the latest period, indicating reliance on potentially variable funding sources. However, the foundation consistently manages to keep liabilities extremely low, at just $1 across all reported periods, which is a strong indicator of financial stability and responsible management of obligations.
The organization appears to be highly efficient in its spending, as evidenced by the 0% officer compensation reported across all available filings. This suggests that a very high proportion of its expenses are directed towards its programmatic activities rather than administrative overhead or executive salaries. While a detailed breakdown of program vs. administrative vs. fundraising expenses isn't explicitly provided in the summary data, the lack of executive compensation is a positive sign for spending efficiency.
In terms of transparency, the foundation has a consistent filing history with the IRS, providing four years of data. The absence of officer compensation is a key transparency point, showing that the organization is not allocating funds to executive salaries. The consistent low liabilities also contribute to a picture of clear and manageable financial obligations, enhancing overall financial transparency.