Is Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy Inc Legit?
Quick charity verification for Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy Inc (EIN: 201678932)
Verdict: Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy Inc appears trustworthy
88/100Mission Score
$10.3MRevenue
$32.8MAssets
1Red Flags
5Strengths
Red Flags
Lack of detailed spending breakdown (program, admin, fundraising) in provided summary data, requiring deeper dive into full 990s for precise efficiency analysis.
Strengths
Consistent growth in assets, from $20,094,385 in 2015 to $31,532,576 in 2023, demonstrating strong financial stewardship.
Generally positive net income (revenue exceeding expenses) in most recent years, such as a $946,448 surplus in 2023.
No reported officer compensation in the provided data, suggesting a high percentage of funds directed to mission.
Low liabilities relative to assets, indicating strong financial health and minimal debt burden.
Consistent IRS 990 filing history (13 filings), demonstrating commitment to transparency.
Spending Breakdown
How Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
12%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
8%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy Inc
Is Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy Inc (EIN: 201678932) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 88/100. 1 red flag identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy Inc a good charity to donate to?
Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy Inc has a Mission Score of 88/100. Revenue: $10.3M. Assets: $32.8M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy Inc is 201678932. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy Inc spend its money?
Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy Inc allocates 80% to programs, 12% to administration, and 8% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 201678932 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy Inc. demonstrates a generally healthy financial position with consistent revenue streams and growing assets. In the latest filing (202312), the organization reported revenue of $8,429,836 against expenses of $7,483,388, indicating a surplus. Over the past several years, assets have steadily increased, reaching $31,532,576 in 2023, which suggests good financial management and capacity for future operations. The organization's liabilities remain relatively low compared to its assets, further reinforcing its stability.
Spending efficiency appears strong, particularly given the nature of maintaining public green spaces. While specific program, administrative, and fundraising expense breakdowns are not provided in the summary data, the overall expense ratio relative to revenue is reasonable. The consistent growth in assets, from $20,094,385 in 2015 to over $31 million in 2023, indicates effective resource accumulation and stewardship. The absence of reported officer compensation in the provided data suggests a commitment to directing funds towards the mission, or that compensation is reported differently or below a certain threshold.
Transparency is generally good, with a consistent filing history of 13 IRS 990s. The public availability of these filings allows for scrutiny of financial operations. The lack of reported officer compensation in the summary data, while potentially positive, would require deeper investigation into the full 990 forms to understand how leadership is compensated, if at all, and to ensure full transparency regarding executive pay.