No reported officer compensation, indicating a volunteer-driven or highly efficient leadership structure.
Consistent IRS 990 filing history, demonstrating good transparency.
Spending Breakdown
How Rose Nulman Park Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Rose Nulman Park Foundation
Is Rose Nulman Park Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Rose Nulman Park Foundation (EIN: 205055687) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Rose Nulman Park Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Rose Nulman Park Foundation has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $136K. Assets: $3.4M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Rose Nulman Park Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Rose Nulman Park Foundation is 205055687. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Rose Nulman Park Foundation spend its money?
Rose Nulman Park Foundation allocates 80% to programs, 20% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Rose Nulman Park Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Rose Nulman Park Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 205055687 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Rose Nulman Park Foundation appears to be a well-established organization with substantial assets, consistently maintaining over $3.4 million in net assets over the past decade. However, its financial activity, particularly revenue generation, has been highly inconsistent and often negative in recent years, with revenues of $-3,632 in 2022 and $-3,377 in 2019. This suggests a reliance on its endowment rather than active fundraising for operational expenses. The organization's expenses have generally been low, ranging from $11,659 to $26,334 in the last five years, which is a positive indicator of cost control given its asset base.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program vs. administrative expenses in the provided data. However, the consistently low total expenses relative to assets suggest that the organization is not overspending. The absence of officer compensation across all reported periods indicates a volunteer-led or very lean operational structure, which contributes to efficiency. The foundation's transparency is good, with consistent IRS 990 filings available over a long period, showing a clear financial history.
Overall, while the foundation demonstrates strong asset management and low operational costs, its ability to generate consistent positive revenue from external sources is a concern. Its financial health seems to be sustained by its significant endowment rather than ongoing public support or active program income. The lack of officer compensation is a strong positive for efficiency and public trust.