Quick charity verification for Roxie And Azad Joseph Foundation (EIN: 202388760)
Verdict: Roxie And Azad Joseph Foundation appears trustworthy
75/100Mission Score
$4.2MRevenue
$9.4MAssets
2Red Flags
3Strengths
Red Flags
Consistent operational deficits, with expenses exceeding revenue in most recent periods (e.g., 202404, 202304, 202104, 202004, 201604, 201504, 201304, 201204).
Declining asset base over time, from a high of $10,663,049 in 201204 to $9,447,655 currently, indicating reliance on capital for operations.
Strengths
Zero officer compensation reported across all filings, indicating efficient use of funds and dedication to mission.
Substantial asset base of $9,447,655 provides long-term financial stability.
Consistent IRS 990 filing history demonstrates good transparency and compliance.
Spending Breakdown
How Roxie And Azad Joseph Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Roxie And Azad Joseph Foundation
Is Roxie And Azad Joseph Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Roxie And Azad Joseph Foundation (EIN: 202388760) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Roxie And Azad Joseph Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Roxie And Azad Joseph Foundation has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $4.2M. Assets: $9.4M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Roxie And Azad Joseph Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Roxie And Azad Joseph Foundation is 202388760. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Roxie And Azad Joseph Foundation spend its money?
Roxie And Azad Joseph Foundation allocates 85% to programs, 15% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Roxie And Azad Joseph Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Roxie And Azad Joseph Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 202388760 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Roxie And Azad Joseph Foundation demonstrates consistent financial stability with substantial assets, currently at $9,447,655. However, the organization has consistently reported expenses exceeding revenue in most recent periods, such as in 202404 where expenses were $640,305 against revenues of $596,718, and in 202304 with expenses of $662,026 against revenues of $402,637. This trend suggests the foundation is drawing down on its substantial asset base to cover operational costs and grantmaking. While this is not inherently negative for a foundation with a large endowment, it indicates a reliance on past capital rather than current fundraising or investment income to sustain activities.
The foundation's transparency is bolstered by its consistent filing of IRS Form 990s, with 11 filings available. A notable aspect is the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available periods, which is a strong indicator of efficient use of funds and a commitment to directing resources towards its mission rather than executive salaries. The NTEE code T22 suggests a focus on grantmaking foundations, which typically have lower program spending ratios compared to direct service charities, as their primary 'program' is distributing grants. Without detailed expense breakdowns, it's challenging to assess the efficiency of administrative costs, but the lack of executive compensation is a positive sign.
Overall, the foundation appears financially sound due to its significant assets, but its operational model relies on asset utilization rather than self-sufficiency through current revenue. Its transparency is good through regular filings and the absence of executive compensation. Further analysis would require a detailed breakdown of program vs. administrative expenses, which is not provided in the summary data.