Is Sakima Country Club Legit?

Red Flags

Consistent operational deficits, with expenses frequently exceeding revenue (e.g., 2023: $31,393 deficit; 2022: $4,955 deficit).
Significant increase in liabilities from $4,528 in 2018 to $105,947 in 2023, indicating growing financial obligations.
Fluctuating asset base, from a high of $212,985 in 2014 to $61,703 in 2023, suggesting potential instability or significant asset changes.
Lack of NTEE code makes it difficult to categorize and benchmark the organization's activities and financial performance against peers.

Spending Breakdown

How Sakima Country Club allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

80%

Program Spending

Healthy — majority goes to mission

15%

Admin Costs

Reasonable — admin costs in check

Fundraising

Within typical range

How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Sakima Country Club

Is Sakima Country Club a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Sakima Country Club (EIN: 210442493) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 55/100. 4 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.

Is Sakima Country Club a good charity to donate to?

Sakima Country Club has a Mission Score of 55/100. Revenue: $573K. Assets: $81K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Sakima Country Club?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Sakima Country Club is 210442493. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Sakima Country Club spend its money?

Sakima Country Club allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Sakima Country Club's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Sakima Country Club's tax-exempt status using EIN 210442493 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

Sakima Country Club's financial health appears to be consistently operating at a deficit, with expenses frequently exceeding revenue in recent years. For example, in 2023, expenses were $502,477 against revenues of $471,084, and in 2022, expenses were $458,090 against revenues of $453,135. This trend suggests a reliance on existing assets or other funding sources to cover operational costs, as evidenced by fluctuating asset levels and increasing liabilities in some periods. The organization's assets have varied significantly, from a high of $212,985 in 2014 to a low of $29,929 in 2020, and currently stand at $81,220, indicating some financial instability or significant capital expenditures/disposals over time.

Regarding spending efficiency, without a detailed breakdown of expenses (program, administrative, fundraising) within the provided data, it's challenging to fully assess. However, the consistent operational deficits raise questions about the sustainability of its current spending patterns relative to its revenue generation. The organization reports 0% officer compensation across all filings, which is a positive indicator for minimizing overhead related to executive pay. Transparency is generally good given the availability of 990 filings, but the lack of NTEE code makes it difficult to benchmark against similar organizations.

The organization's liabilities have shown an upward trend in recent years, reaching $105,947 in 2023, which is a concern given its relatively modest asset base. This could indicate increasing debt or deferred obligations. The overall financial picture suggests an organization that is managing to operate but often at a loss, requiring careful monitoring of its financial strategy to ensure long-term viability.

Verdict: Sakima Country Club shows mixed signals