Long history of IRS 990 filings (13 filings), demonstrating transparency and consistent reporting.
Low liabilities relative to assets across all reported periods, indicating financial stability.
Stable asset base over the long term, despite recent fluctuations.
Spending Breakdown
How Sakurakai Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Sakurakai Inc
Is Sakurakai Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Sakurakai Inc (EIN: 205816286) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 80/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Sakurakai Inc a good charity to donate to?
Sakurakai Inc has a Mission Score of 80/100. Revenue: $39K. Assets: $35K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Sakurakai Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Sakurakai Inc is 205816286. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Sakurakai Inc spend its money?
Sakurakai Inc allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Sakurakai Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Sakurakai Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 205816286 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Sakurakai Inc. demonstrates a consistent operational history, with 13 filings indicating a stable, albeit small, financial footprint. The organization's financial health appears to be managed conservatively, with assets generally exceeding liabilities. For instance, in the 202403 period, assets were $31,322 against liabilities of $2,385. However, the organization has frequently operated with expenses exceeding revenue in recent years, such as in 202403 (Revenue $26,731, Expenses $28,644) and 202303 (Revenue $11,628, Expenses $20,708), which could indicate reliance on prior reserves or fluctuating funding.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, as the provided data only includes total expenses. However, the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all periods suggests a high degree of volunteerism at the leadership level, which is a positive indicator for minimizing administrative overhead. Transparency is strong given the consistent filing of IRS Form 990s over many years, providing a clear historical record of financial activity.