All revenue directly applied to mission (break-even operations)
Strong program focus (estimated 90% program spending)
Spending Breakdown
How Sanford Springvale Soccer Association Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Sanford Springvale Soccer Association Inc
Is Sanford Springvale Soccer Association Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Sanford Springvale Soccer Association Inc (EIN: 10483319) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 1 red flag identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Sanford Springvale Soccer Association Inc a good charity to donate to?
Sanford Springvale Soccer Association Inc has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $191K. Assets: $21K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Sanford Springvale Soccer Association Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Sanford Springvale Soccer Association Inc is 10483319. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Sanford Springvale Soccer Association Inc spend its money?
Sanford Springvale Soccer Association Inc allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Sanford Springvale Soccer Association Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Sanford Springvale Soccer Association Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 10483319 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Sanford Springvale Soccer Association Inc appears to be a small, community-focused organization with a very lean financial structure. For the 2023 fiscal period, the organization reported revenues of $234,115 and expenses of $234,115, indicating a break-even operation. This suggests that all incoming funds are directly utilized for the organization's activities, which is common for smaller, volunteer-driven nonprofits. Their assets of $23,634 and liabilities of $23,634 for the same period show a balanced sheet, with no significant accumulated reserves or debt, reinforcing their operational model of spending what they receive.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which are not explicitly provided in the summary data. However, the fact that 0% of expenses were allocated to officer compensation suggests a high degree of volunteer involvement at the leadership level, which is a positive indicator of efficiency for a small nonprofit. Transparency is generally good given the availability of their 990 filing, but more granular expense data would enhance understanding of their operational efficiency.