Extremely limited assets ($1) indicating no financial reserves
Very small operational scale ($6,580 revenue) limits potential impact
Strengths
No reported officer compensation, suggesting volunteer leadership
Operated debt-free with $0 liabilities
All expenses matched revenue, indicating no deficit spending
Spending Breakdown
How Saving Precious Angels allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
100%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
0%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Saving Precious Angels
Is Saving Precious Angels a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Saving Precious Angels (EIN: 10849686) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Saving Precious Angels a good charity to donate to?
Saving Precious Angels has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $7K. Assets: $1. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Saving Precious Angels?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Saving Precious Angels is 10849686. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Saving Precious Angels spend its money?
Saving Precious Angels allocates 100% to programs, 0% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Saving Precious Angels's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Saving Precious Angels's tax-exempt status using EIN 10849686 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Saving Precious Angels appears to be a very small, nascent organization based on its latest IRS 990 filing. With total revenue of $6,580 and exactly matching expenses of $6,580, the organization operated at a break-even point. Its asset base is minimal at just $1, indicating very limited financial reserves or infrastructure. The lack of liabilities suggests a debt-free operation, which is positive for an organization of this size. However, the extremely small scale of operations makes it difficult to assess long-term financial health or efficiency trends from a single filing.
The organization reports no officer compensation, which is common for very small, volunteer-led nonprofits and contributes to a high program spending ratio if all expenses were program-related. Without a detailed breakdown of the $6,580 in expenses, it's challenging to definitively assess spending efficiency across programs, administration, and fundraising. Given the minimal financial activity, transparency is currently limited to the basic information provided in its single 990 filing, which shows a straightforward financial picture for its first reported period.