Is Schuyler Center For Analysis And Advocacy Inc Legit?
Quick charity verification for Schuyler Center For Analysis And Advocacy Inc (EIN: 135562357)
Verdict: Schuyler Center For Analysis And Advocacy Inc appears trustworthy
85/100Mission Score
$9.0MRevenue
$12.3MAssets
2Red Flags
4Strengths
Red Flags
Expenses exceeded revenue in the latest fiscal period (202406), indicating a potential short-term financial strain.
Consistent 0% officer compensation across all filings is unusual for an organization with over $2 million in annual revenue and could indicate a lack of transparency in compensation reporting or an unusual compensation structure.
Strengths
Consistent asset growth over the past decade, from $6.5 million in 201606 to $10.8 million in 202406, indicating strong financial management.
Low liabilities relative to assets across all periods, suggesting financial stability and low debt burden.
Long history of IRS 990 filings (14 filings), demonstrating a commitment to transparency.
Strong program focus implied by the absence of reported officer compensation, suggesting a high proportion of funds are directed to mission.
Spending Breakdown
How Schuyler Center For Analysis And Advocacy Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
7%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
3%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Schuyler Center For Analysis And Advocacy Inc
Is Schuyler Center For Analysis And Advocacy Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Schuyler Center For Analysis And Advocacy Inc (EIN: 135562357) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Schuyler Center For Analysis And Advocacy Inc a good charity to donate to?
Schuyler Center For Analysis And Advocacy Inc has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $9.0M. Assets: $12.3M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Schuyler Center For Analysis And Advocacy Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Schuyler Center For Analysis And Advocacy Inc is 135562357. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Schuyler Center For Analysis And Advocacy Inc spend its money?
Schuyler Center For Analysis And Advocacy Inc allocates 90% to programs, 7% to administration, and 3% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Schuyler Center For Analysis And Advocacy Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Schuyler Center For Analysis And Advocacy Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 135562357 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Schuyler Center For Analysis And Advocacy Inc demonstrates a generally healthy financial position with consistent asset growth over the past decade, reaching $10,798,819 in assets by the 202406 period. The organization has shown a positive trend in revenue, with the latest reported revenue at $2,447,695 for the 202406 period, though this period also saw expenses ($2,690,632) exceeding revenue. This is a notable shift from previous periods, such as 202306, where revenue ($2,964,927) significantly outpaced expenses ($1,951,589).
The organization's spending efficiency appears to be strong, as indicated by the absence of reported officer compensation across all available filings, suggesting that executive salaries are either very low or not categorized as officer compensation in a way that triggers reporting thresholds, which is a positive sign for donor confidence. The consistent growth in assets, from $6,532,040 in 201606 to over $10 million in recent years, suggests sound financial management and accumulation of resources. However, the recent deficit in the 202406 period warrants closer monitoring to ensure it's an anomaly rather than a trend.
Transparency is high given the consistent filing of IRS Form 990s over 14 periods, providing a clear historical financial record. The lack of reported officer compensation is a significant positive for transparency, as it indicates that a substantial portion of funds is likely directed towards programmatic activities rather than high executive salaries. The relatively low liabilities compared to assets across all periods also points to a stable financial structure.