Is Screaming Comet Foundation Legit?

Quick charity verification for Screaming Comet Foundation (EIN: 200512645)

Verdict: Screaming Comet Foundation shows mixed signals

45/100Mission Score
$6.6MRevenue
$158.7MAssets
4Red Flags
4Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

AI Transparency Report

The Screaming Comet Foundation demonstrates exceptional financial health, with its assets growing from $10.3 million in 2011 to over $158.7 million currently, indicating robust financial management and significant asset accumulation. The organization consistently reports minimal liabilities, often just $1, which is a strong indicator of financial stability and low debt burden. However, a notable concern is the extremely low expense ratios relative to revenue in recent years. For instance, in 2022, the foundation reported $36.2 million in revenue against only $3.6 million in expenses, and in 2021, $43.8 million in revenue against a mere $357,399 in expenses. This suggests that a very small portion of its substantial revenue is being spent on its stated mission or operations, raising questions about spending efficiency and the immediate impact of its programs. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings suggests either a fully volunteer-led executive team or that compensation is reported under different categories, which could impact transparency regarding leadership costs. The significant disparity between revenue and expenses, particularly in recent years, warrants further investigation into how the organization's substantial assets are being utilized to fulfill its NTEE code T20 mission (Philanthropy, Voluntarism & Grantmaking Foundations). While asset growth is positive, the low expense-to-revenue ratio could indicate that the foundation is primarily an endowment-building entity rather than an active grantmaker or program implementer. Without a detailed breakdown of program service expenses versus administrative and fundraising costs, it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency. The lack of reported officer compensation is a positive for minimizing overhead, but the overall low spending relative to available resources suggests a potential for greater programmatic deployment.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages