Is Second Start Legit?

Quick charity verification for Second Start (EIN: 20302477)

Verdict: Second Start appears trustworthy

80/100Mission Score
$4.8MRevenue
$3.3MAssets
1Red Flags
3Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

Spending Breakdown

How Second Start allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Second Start

Is Second Start a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Second Start (EIN: 20302477) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 80/100. 1 red flag identified, 3 strengths noted.

Is Second Start a good charity to donate to?

Second Start has a Mission Score of 80/100. Revenue: $4.8M. Assets: $3.3M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Second Start?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Second Start is 20302477. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Second Start spend its money?

Second Start allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Second Start's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Second Start's tax-exempt status using EIN 20302477 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

Second Start demonstrates consistent financial activity, with revenues and expenses generally increasing over the past decade. In the most recent filing (202306), the organization reported revenues of $3,747,518 against expenses of $3,805,978, indicating a slight operational deficit for that period. However, this is not a consistent trend, as previous years like 202206 and 202106 showed surpluses. The organization maintains a healthy asset base, with $3,058,971 in assets against $354,384 in liabilities in 202306, suggesting good financial solvency. One notable aspect is the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings. This indicates either that executive compensation is not reported under 'officer compensation' or that the organization operates with a volunteer or very low-paid executive structure, which is highly unusual for an organization of its size (latest revenue $4,820,207). This lack of reported executive compensation could be a transparency concern if it's merely a reporting anomaly, or a significant strength if it genuinely reflects a highly efficient, volunteer-led executive team. Further investigation into the specific breakdown of expenses would be necessary to fully assess spending efficiency and program allocation, as the provided data lacks detailed expense categories beyond total expenses.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages