Is Sego Lily School Legit?

Spending Breakdown

How Sego Lily School allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

75%

Program Spending

Healthy — majority goes to mission

15%

Admin Costs

Reasonable — admin costs in check

10%

Fundraising

Within typical range

How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Sego Lily School

Is Sego Lily School a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Sego Lily School (EIN: 200078044) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 55/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.

Is Sego Lily School a good charity to donate to?

Sego Lily School has a Mission Score of 55/100. Revenue: $68K. Assets: $1.2M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Sego Lily School?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Sego Lily School is 200078044. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Sego Lily School spend its money?

Sego Lily School allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Sego Lily School's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Sego Lily School's tax-exempt status using EIN 200078044 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

Sego Lily School demonstrates consistent operational deficits, with expenses exceeding revenue in 9 out of the last 10 reported periods. For instance, in 2020, revenue was $68,308 while expenses were $80,982, indicating a $12,674 shortfall. This pattern suggests a reliance on existing assets or other funding mechanisms to cover operational costs. The organization's assets have remained relatively stable around $1.2 million in recent years, but liabilities have also consistently been high, often exceeding assets, as seen in 2020 where liabilities were $1,226,655 against assets of $1,195,181. This indicates a potentially precarious financial position with negative net assets.

Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which are not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent operational losses raise concerns about long-term sustainability if not addressed. The absence of reported officer compensation across all filings suggests either a volunteer-led organization or that compensation is below reporting thresholds, which can be a positive indicator for resource allocation to mission, but also limits insight into leadership structure. Transparency is moderate; while filings are consistent, the lack of detailed expense categories in this summary limits a deeper analysis of how funds are truly being utilized.

Overall, Sego Lily School appears to be operating with a structural deficit, consistently spending more than it brings in. While its asset base is substantial, the high level of liabilities, often exceeding assets, points to a challenging financial situation. The lack of reported executive compensation is a positive for resource allocation, but more detailed expense breakdowns would enhance transparency and allow for a more precise evaluation of spending efficiency.

Verdict: Sego Lily School shows mixed signals

Red Flags

Strengths