Long and consistent filing history (10 filings), demonstrating commitment to transparency and regulatory compliance.
Spending Breakdown
How Selander Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Selander Foundation
Is Selander Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Selander Foundation (EIN: 202024998) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 80/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Selander Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Selander Foundation has a Mission Score of 80/100. Revenue: $10.7M. Assets: $35.3M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Selander Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Selander Foundation is 202024998. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Selander Foundation spend its money?
Selander Foundation allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Selander Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Selander Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 202024998 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Selander Foundation demonstrates a strong financial position with substantial assets, growing from $6.59 million in 2011 to over $37 million in 2023. However, its spending efficiency shows significant variability. In 2023, the organization spent $5.98 million while only generating $2.36 million in revenue, indicating a year where expenses significantly outstripped income. This contrasts sharply with previous years like 2021, where revenue of $5.57 million far exceeded expenses of $2.62 million. The consistent reporting of zero officer compensation across all filings suggests a high degree of transparency regarding executive pay, or that executive functions are performed on a volunteer basis or compensated through other means not reported as officer compensation.
The foundation's program focus appears to be well-supported, given the consistent growth in assets over the long term. The significant increase in expenses in 2023, nearly tripling from the previous year's $2.20 million, warrants further investigation to understand if this was due to a major program expansion or other operational costs. The minimal liabilities reported across all periods (often $1 or $0) indicate excellent financial management and a low-risk profile in terms of debt. The foundation's transparency is further bolstered by its consistent filing history, providing a decade of financial data for public scrutiny.
While the foundation maintains a robust asset base, the recent trend of expenses exceeding revenue, particularly in 2023, suggests a potential reliance on investment income or prior year surpluses to fund operations. This pattern, if sustained, could impact long-term financial stability despite the current strong asset position. The absence of reported officer compensation is a notable positive for transparency, assuming all relevant compensation is disclosed.