Latest filing shows $0 revenue and $0 assets, raising questions about current operational viability.
Lack of detailed expense breakdown makes it difficult to fully analyze program efficiency.
Strengths
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation, indicating volunteer leadership.
No reported liabilities across all filing periods, suggesting financial prudence.
Historically, nearly all revenue was spent each year, indicating funds were deployed quickly.
Spending Breakdown
How Shechinah Empowerment Ministry Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Shechinah Empowerment Ministry Inc
Is Shechinah Empowerment Ministry Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Shechinah Empowerment Ministry Inc (EIN: 208125709) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Shechinah Empowerment Ministry Inc a good charity to donate to?
Shechinah Empowerment Ministry Inc has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Shechinah Empowerment Ministry Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Shechinah Empowerment Ministry Inc is 208125709. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Shechinah Empowerment Ministry Inc spend its money?
Shechinah Empowerment Ministry Inc allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Shechinah Empowerment Ministry Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Shechinah Empowerment Ministry Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 208125709 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Shechinah Empowerment Ministry Inc appears to be a very small, community-focused organization, as indicated by its modest financial activity. Over its filing history, annual revenues have consistently been below $90,000, with the latest period showing $0 in both revenue and assets, suggesting a period of inactivity or very minimal operations. The organization has maintained a lean financial profile, with assets never exceeding $1,585 and no reported liabilities, which indicates a lack of significant capital accumulation or debt.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of expenses beyond total expenses. However, the organization consistently spent nearly all of its revenue each year, with net income being very small (e.g., $350 in 2013, $60 in 2012). This suggests that funds received were quickly deployed towards its mission. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings is a strong indicator of volunteer leadership, which can contribute to lower administrative costs and a higher proportion of funds going directly to programs.
Transparency is generally good given the available data, with consistent filings. The absence of officer compensation is a positive transparency signal. However, the lack of detailed expense breakdowns in the provided summary makes it challenging to fully evaluate the allocation of funds between programs, administration, and fundraising. The recent $0 revenue and assets raise questions about its current operational status, which would ideally be clarified in a more detailed transparency report.