Latest filing shows $0 revenue and assets, indicating potential dormancy or cessation of operations.
Consistent operation with net losses in multiple years (e.g., 2015, 2014, 2013, 2011) suggests potential financial instability.
Low asset base across all years, peaking at $20,204 in 2012, limits long-term financial resilience.
Strengths
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation, suggesting a volunteer-driven model and efficient use of funds for leadership.
History of filing IRS 990s, demonstrating a commitment to transparency in previous active years.
Spending Breakdown
How Shift Empowerment Programs allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Shift Empowerment Programs
Is Shift Empowerment Programs a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Shift Empowerment Programs (EIN: 201110069) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 55/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Shift Empowerment Programs a good charity to donate to?
Shift Empowerment Programs has a Mission Score of 55/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Shift Empowerment Programs?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Shift Empowerment Programs is 201110069. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Shift Empowerment Programs spend its money?
Shift Empowerment Programs allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Shift Empowerment Programs's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Shift Empowerment Programs's tax-exempt status using EIN 201110069 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Shift Empowerment Programs appears to be a very small nonprofit with limited financial activity, as indicated by its latest reported revenue and assets of $0. However, historical filings show consistent, albeit modest, operations. For example, in 2016, the organization reported revenue of $84,519 and expenses of $74,740, resulting in a small surplus. The organization has consistently operated with revenues and expenses in the range of $80,000 to $113,000 annually across its filing history. The lack of reported revenue and assets in the latest period could indicate a dormancy or cessation of operations, which is a significant concern for financial health and sustainability.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses. However, the consistent reporting of zero officer compensation across all available filings suggests that the organization is not incurring significant overhead in executive salaries, which is a positive indicator for resource allocation. The organization's assets have remained relatively low, peaking at $20,204 in 2012, and liabilities have also been modest, suggesting a lean operational model. The absence of detailed expense categories in the provided data limits a deeper analysis of spending efficiency.
Transparency is generally good given the availability of multiple years of IRS 990 filings. However, the most recent filing showing $0 in revenue and assets, without further context, raises questions about the organization's current status. While historical data is available, the current financial picture is unclear, which impacts overall transparency regarding its ongoing operations and financial health. The consistent reporting of zero officer compensation is a transparent practice.