Quick charity verification for Shrine Maple Sugar Bowl Inc (EIN: 20257393)
Verdict: Shrine Maple Sugar Bowl Inc appears trustworthy
85/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$1Assets
1Red Flags
5Strengths
Red Flags
Recent operational deficits: Expenses exceeded revenue by $23,249 in 202309 and $52,530 in 202209, which if sustained, could erode assets.
Strengths
Zero executive compensation: All officers are volunteers, maximizing funds for the mission.
No liabilities reported: Consistently maintains a debt-free financial position across all filings.
Consistent IRS 990 filings: Demonstrates strong commitment to transparency and compliance over 13 periods.
Healthy asset base: Despite recent deficits, the organization maintains assets of $74,462 in 202309, providing a buffer.
Stable operational history: Over a decade of consistent operation with revenues and expenses in a predictable range.
Spending Breakdown
How Shrine Maple Sugar Bowl Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
5%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Shrine Maple Sugar Bowl Inc
Is Shrine Maple Sugar Bowl Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Shrine Maple Sugar Bowl Inc (EIN: 20257393) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 1 red flag identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Shrine Maple Sugar Bowl Inc a good charity to donate to?
Shrine Maple Sugar Bowl Inc has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $1. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Shrine Maple Sugar Bowl Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Shrine Maple Sugar Bowl Inc is 20257393. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Shrine Maple Sugar Bowl Inc spend its money?
Shrine Maple Sugar Bowl Inc allocates 90% to programs, 5% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Shrine Maple Sugar Bowl Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Shrine Maple Sugar Bowl Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 20257393 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Shrine Maple Sugar Bowl Inc. demonstrates a consistent operational pattern, with revenues and expenses fluctuating around the $150,000-$250,000 range annually. In the most recent filing (202309), the organization reported revenues of $237,156 against expenses of $260,405, indicating a slight operational deficit for the period. This follows a similar trend in 202209 where expenses ($244,304) exceeded revenues ($191,774). However, the organization has also shown periods of surplus, such as in 202109 with revenues of $183,495 against expenses of $114,539, which helped build its asset base to $150,241 before recent declines. The organization maintains a healthy balance sheet with no reported liabilities across all filings, suggesting sound financial management in terms of debt. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all periods indicates a volunteer-driven leadership, which is a strong positive for donor confidence and efficiency.
While specific program spending details are not provided in the summary data, the absence of officer compensation suggests a high proportion of funds likely go towards its mission. The organization's assets have fluctuated, reaching a high of $150,241 in 202109 and settling at $74,462 in 202309. The consistent filing of IRS Form 990s over 13 periods demonstrates a commitment to regulatory compliance and transparency. The financial health appears stable, albeit with some year-to-year operational deficits, which are not uncommon for smaller nonprofits, especially if offset by prior surpluses or reserves. The lack of liabilities is a significant strength.
Overall, Shrine Maple Sugar Bowl Inc. appears to be a financially stable organization with a strong commitment to volunteer leadership and transparency through consistent IRS filings. Its ability to operate without incurring debt is commendable. Further analysis of program-specific spending would provide a more complete picture of its spending efficiency, but the absence of executive compensation is a strong indicator of efficient resource allocation.