Is Sigma Delta Tau Society Legit?

Quick charity verification for Sigma Delta Tau Society (EIN: 161241677)

Verdict: Sigma Delta Tau Society appears trustworthy

70/100Mission Score
$940KRevenue
$147KAssets
4Red Flags
4Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

Spending Breakdown

How Sigma Delta Tau Society allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Sigma Delta Tau Society

Is Sigma Delta Tau Society a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Sigma Delta Tau Society (EIN: 161241677) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 4 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.

Is Sigma Delta Tau Society a good charity to donate to?

Sigma Delta Tau Society has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $940K. Assets: $147K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Sigma Delta Tau Society?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Sigma Delta Tau Society is 161241677. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Sigma Delta Tau Society spend its money?

Sigma Delta Tau Society allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Sigma Delta Tau Society's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Sigma Delta Tau Society's tax-exempt status using EIN 161241677 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

Sigma Delta Tau Society demonstrates generally stable financial health, with revenues consistently exceeding expenses in most recent years, such as the $908,934 revenue against $807,017 expenses in 2024. However, the organization's assets have fluctuated, decreasing from $260,048 in 2023 to $233,021 in 2024, and further to $146,636 in the latest reported period, which warrants attention. Liabilities have remained relatively low, indicating a manageable debt burden. The spending efficiency appears reasonable given the consistent positive net income in most periods. Without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses from the provided data, a precise assessment of spending efficiency is challenging. However, the absence of reported officer compensation across all filings suggests a lean operational structure or that compensation is categorized differently, which could be a positive indicator for donor confidence. Transparency is moderately good, with consistent IRS 990 filings over 13 periods. The lack of reported officer compensation is a notable point for transparency, as it either indicates a volunteer-led executive team or that compensation is embedded within other expense categories, which would require further clarification for complete transparency. The NTEE code being unknown also limits a full understanding of its specific programmatic focus.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages