How Southern Hills Senior Residences Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Southern Hills Senior Residences Inc
Is Southern Hills Senior Residences Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Southern Hills Senior Residences Inc (EIN: 208387850) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Southern Hills Senior Residences Inc a good charity to donate to?
Southern Hills Senior Residences Inc has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $385K. Assets: $2.4M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Southern Hills Senior Residences Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Southern Hills Senior Residences Inc is 208387850. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Southern Hills Senior Residences Inc spend its money?
Southern Hills Senior Residences Inc allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Southern Hills Senior Residences Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Southern Hills Senior Residences Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 208387850 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Southern Hills Senior Residences Inc. demonstrates a consistent operational deficit, with expenses regularly exceeding revenue. For instance, in 2023, expenses were $457,746 against revenues of $292,290, indicating a significant reliance on existing assets or other funding sources to cover operations. While the organization's assets have been steadily declining over the past decade, from $3,888,204 in 2014 to $2,603,358 in 2023, its liabilities remain relatively low and stable, suggesting responsible debt management. The absence of reported officer compensation across all filings indicates a volunteer-led or very lean executive structure, which can be a positive sign for donor confidence regarding administrative overhead.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which is not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent operating losses raise questions about long-term financial sustainability if current trends continue. The organization's transparency appears strong in terms of financial reporting, with a consistent filing history and clear data on revenue, expenses, and assets. The lack of officer compensation is a notable positive for transparency and efficiency.
Overall, while the organization manages its liabilities well and operates without paid executive compensation, its persistent operating deficits and declining asset base warrant closer examination to understand its long-term viability and how it plans to address these financial trends. The NTEE code L21 (Housing for the Elderly) suggests a critical community service, making its financial health particularly important.