Remarkable commitment to program spending, implied by 0% reported officer compensation.
Long history of IRS 990 filings (13 filings), indicating consistent compliance and transparency.
Spending Breakdown
How Southwest Washington Workforce Development Council allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Southwest Washington Workforce Development Council
Is Southwest Washington Workforce Development Council a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Southwest Washington Workforce Development Council (EIN: 10726348) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 90/100. 1 red flag identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Southwest Washington Workforce Development Council a good charity to donate to?
Southwest Washington Workforce Development Council has a Mission Score of 90/100. Revenue: $8.7M. Assets: $2.7M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Southwest Washington Workforce Development Council?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Southwest Washington Workforce Development Council is 10726348. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Southwest Washington Workforce Development Council spend its money?
Southwest Washington Workforce Development Council allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Southwest Washington Workforce Development Council's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Southwest Washington Workforce Development Council's tax-exempt status using EIN 10726348 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Southwest Washington Workforce Development Council demonstrates consistent financial health, with revenues generally exceeding or closely matching expenses across its filing history. For instance, in the 202306 period, expenses of $7,379,635 were slightly above revenues of $7,352,935, indicating a minor deficit, but this is not a consistent trend. The organization's assets have shown growth, increasing from $1,068,338 in 201506 to $2,810,331 in 202306, suggesting a strengthening balance sheet. Liabilities have also increased, but the asset-to-liability ratio remains healthy, indicating good financial management. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings is a significant indicator of strong financial transparency and a focus on program spending rather than executive enrichment. This practice, while unusual for organizations of this size, suggests that executive salaries are either very low, covered by other means, or not reported in this specific line item, which warrants further investigation for complete transparency.