Is Special Employment Services Legit?

Quick charity verification for Special Employment Services (EIN: 200241990)

Verdict: Special Employment Services has notable concerns

30/100Mission Score
$16KRevenue
$0Assets
4Red Flags
1Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

Spending Breakdown

How Special Employment Services allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Special Employment Services

Is Special Employment Services a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Special Employment Services (EIN: 200241990) has notable concerns. Mission Score: 30/100. 4 red flags identified, 1 strength noted.

Is Special Employment Services a good charity to donate to?

Special Employment Services has a Mission Score of 30/100. Revenue: $16K. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Special Employment Services?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Special Employment Services is 200241990. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Special Employment Services spend its money?

Special Employment Services allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Special Employment Services's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Special Employment Services's tax-exempt status using EIN 200241990 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

Special Employment Services has experienced a significant decline in revenue and assets over the past few years, raising concerns about its long-term financial viability. From a peak revenue of $451,554 in 2013 to just $16,395 currently, and assets dropping from $164,416 in 2017 to $0 currently, the organization appears to be in a precarious financial state. The consistent reporting of zero officer compensation across all available filings suggests a commitment to minimizing administrative overhead in that specific area, which is a positive sign for transparency regarding executive pay. The organization's spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of expenses into program, administrative, and fundraising categories. However, the consistent pattern of expenses exceeding revenue in recent years (e.g., $81,524 expenses vs. $34,041 revenue in 2020) indicates an unsustainable operational model. The lack of assets further limits its capacity to absorb financial shocks or invest in future programs. While the absence of officer compensation is a positive transparency indicator, the overall financial trajectory points to significant operational challenges. Given the dramatic decrease in financial activity and the current zero asset status, the organization's ability to effectively deliver on its mission is severely hampered. The lack of detailed expense breakdowns in the provided data makes a precise spending efficiency analysis challenging, but the overall financial health is clearly deteriorating. The consistent reporting of zero liabilities until 2010, and then zero again from 2011 onwards, suggests a clean balance sheet in terms of debt, but this is overshadowed by the lack of assets and declining revenue.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages