Quick charity verification for St Helena Hospital Foundation (EIN: 201384250)
Verdict: St Helena Hospital Foundation appears trustworthy
85/100Mission Score
$4.7MRevenue
$39.1MAssets
2Red Flags
4Strengths
Red Flags
Consistent 0% officer compensation reported, which is highly unusual for an organization of this size and could indicate compensation is paid through a related entity or not fully transparently reported.
Annual expenses exceeded revenue in the most recent filing (202312), indicating an operating deficit for that period ($4,880,457 expenses vs $4,306,063 revenue).
Strengths
Substantial and growing asset base, reaching $39,351,644 in 202312, providing strong financial stability.
Low liabilities relative to assets, indicating a healthy balance sheet (e.g., $504,970 liabilities vs $39,351,644 assets in 202312).
Long history of IRS 990 filings (13 filings), indicating consistent compliance and transparency.
Positive net revenue in multiple recent years (e.g., 202212, 202112, 202012), demonstrating capacity for surplus generation.
Spending Breakdown
How St Helena Hospital Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about St Helena Hospital Foundation
Is St Helena Hospital Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, St Helena Hospital Foundation (EIN: 201384250) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is St Helena Hospital Foundation a good charity to donate to?
St Helena Hospital Foundation has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $4.7M. Assets: $39.1M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for St Helena Hospital Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for St Helena Hospital Foundation is 201384250. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does St Helena Hospital Foundation spend its money?
St Helena Hospital Foundation allocates 80% to programs, 10% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify St Helena Hospital Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify St Helena Hospital Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 201384250 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
St Helena Hospital Foundation demonstrates a generally stable financial position with significant assets, though its revenue and expense patterns show some volatility. In the most recent filing (202312), the organization reported expenses of $4,880,457 exceeding revenue of $4,306,063, resulting in a deficit for the period. However, its substantial assets of $39,351,644 provide a strong buffer. The foundation consistently reports 0% officer compensation, which is a notable aspect of its financial transparency and operational structure, suggesting that executive leadership is either unpaid or compensated through other means not reported as officer compensation on the 990, or that the foundation's structure relies on volunteer leadership. This practice, while potentially indicating efficiency, warrants further investigation to understand the full compensation picture for key personnel.
The organization's financial health appears robust due to its large asset base relative to its annual operating budget. While there are periods of revenue exceeding expenses (e.g., 202212, 202112, 202012), there are also periods where expenses outpace revenue (e.g., 202312, 201912, 201812). This fluctuation suggests that the foundation may be strategically drawing down on reserves for specific projects or experiencing variations in fundraising success. The consistent reporting of zero officer compensation across all available filings is a significant indicator of transparency regarding executive pay, though it might also imply that key personnel are compensated through a related entity or are volunteers, which would require deeper scrutiny to fully assess. Overall, the foundation appears to be a well-resourced entity supporting its mission, with a clear commitment to not compensating its officers directly from the reported funds.