Quick charity verification for St Louis Regional Clean Cities (EIN: 208442084)
Verdict: St Louis Regional Clean Cities appears trustworthy
90/100Mission Score
$127KRevenue
$59KAssets
1Red Flags
3Strengths
Red Flags
Significant revenue fluctuations year-over-year, making long-term planning potentially challenging (e.g., $356,745 in 2015 vs. $81,057 in 2016).
Strengths
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation, indicating efficient use of funds.
Positive trend in asset growth from $19,419 in 2020 to $66,785 in 2023.
Revenues generally exceeding expenses in recent years (e.g., 2023 revenue $157,948 vs. expenses $134,971).
AI Transparency Report
St Louis Regional Clean Cities demonstrates consistent financial health, with revenues generally exceeding expenses in recent years, leading to a growth in assets from $19,419 in 2020 to $66,785 in 2023. The organization's spending efficiency appears strong, as evidenced by its consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation, suggesting that resources are primarily directed towards its mission rather than executive salaries. While a detailed functional expense breakdown is not provided in the summary data, the absence of officer compensation is a positive indicator of efficient resource allocation.
The organization's transparency is commendable given the publicly available IRS 990 filings. The consistent filing history over 13 periods allows for a clear trend analysis of its financial performance. The growth in assets and the relatively stable revenue streams indicate a well-managed and sustainable operation. The lack of officer compensation also implies a volunteer-driven or very lean administrative structure, which can be a sign of strong commitment to the cause and efficient use of donor funds.
Overall, St Louis Regional Clean Cities appears to be a financially sound and efficiently run organization. Its consistent growth in assets and the absence of executive compensation suggest a strong focus on its programmatic goals and responsible stewardship of funds. Further analysis of detailed program expenses would provide a more granular understanding of its spending efficiency.