Quick charity verification for St Marks Home For Women (EIN: 16014031)
Verdict: St Marks Home For Women has notable concerns
10/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
3Red Flags
1Strengths
Red Flags
Latest filing reports $0 revenue and $0 assets, indicating potential insolvency or cessation of operations.
Consistent trend of expenses significantly exceeding revenue in prior years (e.g., 2015 expenses $111,692 vs. revenue $652).
Significant decline in assets from $1,277,742 in 2011 to $0 in the latest filing.
Strengths
Historically reported no officer compensation, indicating resources were not used for executive salaries.
Spending Breakdown
How St Marks Home For Women allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
0%
Program Spending
Concerning — less than half to programs
0%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about St Marks Home For Women
Is St Marks Home For Women a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, St Marks Home For Women (EIN: 16014031) has notable concerns. Mission Score: 10/100. 3 red flags identified, 1 strength noted.
Is St Marks Home For Women a good charity to donate to?
St Marks Home For Women has a Mission Score of 10/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for St Marks Home For Women?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for St Marks Home For Women is 16014031. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does St Marks Home For Women spend its money?
St Marks Home For Women allocates 0% to programs, 0% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify St Marks Home For Women's tax-exempt status?
You can verify St Marks Home For Women's tax-exempt status using EIN 16014031 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
St Marks Home For Women appears to be in a state of significant financial decline, as evidenced by its latest filing reporting $0 in both revenue and assets. This is a stark contrast to its historical performance, where it consistently reported revenues in the hundreds of thousands and assets exceeding $800,000. The organization has experienced a consistent trend of expenses significantly outpacing revenue in recent years, such as in 2015 when expenses were $111,692 against only $652 in revenue, and in 2014 with $319,636 in expenses versus $96,485 in revenue. This suggests a prolonged period of operating at a deficit, drawing down its assets.
The lack of reported revenue and assets in the latest filing, coupled with the absence of officer compensation throughout its filing history, raises serious questions about the organization's current operational status and financial viability. While the historical filings show no officer compensation, which can be a positive indicator of resource allocation, the current financial state overshadows this. Without more recent data or an explanation for the $0 figures, it's difficult to assess current spending efficiency or transparency beyond noting the severe financial deterioration.