Consistent IRS 990 filing history demonstrates compliance and transparency.
Minimal liabilities reported across all filings ($0 or $1), indicating strong financial health.
Spending Breakdown
How Stanley Bagnasco Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Stanley Bagnasco Foundation
Is Stanley Bagnasco Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Stanley Bagnasco Foundation (EIN: 204889640) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 1 red flag identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Stanley Bagnasco Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Stanley Bagnasco Foundation has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $2.4M. Assets: $3.3M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Stanley Bagnasco Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Stanley Bagnasco Foundation is 204889640. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Stanley Bagnasco Foundation spend its money?
Stanley Bagnasco Foundation allocates 85% to programs, 15% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Stanley Bagnasco Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Stanley Bagnasco Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 204889640 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Stanley Bagnasco Foundation appears to be a private foundation, as indicated by its consistent revenue streams and asset base, with minimal liabilities reported across all filings. Its financial health is stable, with assets consistently over $2 million, reaching $3,297,476 in its latest filing. Revenue has fluctuated, with a notable spike to $2,429,819 in the latest period, likely due to investment gains or a significant contribution, as typical operating revenues are much lower. The foundation consistently reports zero officer compensation, which is a strong indicator of efficient spending on administrative overhead related to personnel.
Spending efficiency is generally good, especially considering the zero officer compensation. However, without a detailed breakdown of program service expenses versus administrative and fundraising costs from the provided data, a precise efficiency ratio cannot be calculated. The foundation's expenses have remained relatively stable, typically in the range of $100,000-$250,000 annually, while its asset base has grown. This suggests that a significant portion of its revenue, particularly in high-revenue years, is reinvested or held, contributing to asset growth rather than immediate program spending.
Transparency is high regarding executive compensation, as it consistently reports $0. This simplifies the analysis of potential conflicts of interest or excessive pay. However, the provided data lacks granular detail on how expenses are categorized (program, administrative, fundraising), which limits a full assessment of its spending priorities. The consistent filing of IRS Form 990s demonstrates compliance with reporting requirements.