Low reported expenses in active periods relative to revenue, suggesting efficient use of funds (e.g., $1,768 expenses on $3,602 revenue in 2012)
Spending Breakdown
How Stevens Hose Company Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Stevens Hose Company Inc
Is Stevens Hose Company Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Stevens Hose Company Inc (EIN: 20572510) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Stevens Hose Company Inc a good charity to donate to?
Stevens Hose Company Inc has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Stevens Hose Company Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Stevens Hose Company Inc is 20572510. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Stevens Hose Company Inc spend its money?
Stevens Hose Company Inc allocates 80% to programs, 10% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Stevens Hose Company Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Stevens Hose Company Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 20572510 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Stevens Hose Company Inc appears to be a very small, volunteer-driven organization based on its financial filings. With zero revenue and assets reported in its latest filing, and very modest figures in prior years (e.g., $3,602 revenue in 2012), it suggests minimal financial activity. The organization consistently reports 0% officer compensation, indicating a strong reliance on unpaid leadership, which is a positive sign for donor confidence and efficiency. However, the lack of recent financial data (latest filing period 201212) makes a current assessment challenging. The organization's transparency is good in terms of making its past filings available, but the absence of more recent data limits a comprehensive, up-to-date analysis of its financial health and spending efficiency.