Long and consistent IRS 990 filing history (14 filings), demonstrating transparency.
Historically low administrative and fundraising costs due to 0% officer compensation.
Spending Breakdown
How Stillaguamish Gardens allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Stillaguamish Gardens
Is Stillaguamish Gardens a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Stillaguamish Gardens (EIN: 202261271) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 3 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Stillaguamish Gardens a good charity to donate to?
Stillaguamish Gardens has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $948K. Assets: $3.6M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Stillaguamish Gardens?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Stillaguamish Gardens is 202261271. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Stillaguamish Gardens spend its money?
Stillaguamish Gardens allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Stillaguamish Gardens's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Stillaguamish Gardens's tax-exempt status using EIN 202261271 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Stillaguamish Gardens demonstrates consistent financial activity over the past decade, with annual revenues generally in the low $200,000s and expenses slightly exceeding revenue, indicating a reliance on existing assets or prior year surpluses. The organization's assets have remained substantial, consistently above $2.7 million, suggesting a strong foundational base. However, the most recent filing (202312) shows a significant increase in expenses to $956,226 against revenue of $205,584, leading to a substantial deficit and a notable increase in liabilities to $926,768. This recent shift warrants closer examination to understand the nature of these increased expenditures and how they were financed.
Spending efficiency appears to be a concern in the latest period, given the large deficit. Prior to 2023, expenses were relatively stable and manageable. The organization reports 0% officer compensation across all filings, which is a positive indicator of volunteer leadership or very low administrative overhead related to executive pay. This also contributes to a perception of good stewardship regarding compensation.
Transparency is generally good, with a consistent filing history of 14 IRS 990 forms. The absence of officer compensation simplifies the analysis of executive pay. However, the dramatic change in the 2023 financial period, particularly the large increase in liabilities, suggests a need for more detailed information to fully assess the organization's current financial health and future sustainability. Without further context on the nature of the 2023 expenses and liabilities, it's difficult to fully evaluate the long-term implications.