Is Stone Map And Atlas Foundation Legit?

Quick charity verification for Stone Map And Atlas Foundation (EIN: 201945131)

Verdict: Stone Map And Atlas Foundation has notable concerns

35/100Mission Score
$63Revenue
$10.0MAssets
5Red Flags
2Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

Spending Breakdown

How Stone Map And Atlas Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Stone Map And Atlas Foundation

Is Stone Map And Atlas Foundation a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Stone Map And Atlas Foundation (EIN: 201945131) has notable concerns. Mission Score: 35/100. 5 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.

Is Stone Map And Atlas Foundation a good charity to donate to?

Stone Map And Atlas Foundation has a Mission Score of 35/100. Revenue: $63. Assets: $10.0M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Stone Map And Atlas Foundation?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Stone Map And Atlas Foundation is 201945131. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Stone Map And Atlas Foundation spend its money?

Stone Map And Atlas Foundation allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Stone Map And Atlas Foundation's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Stone Map And Atlas Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 201945131 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

The Stone Map And Atlas Foundation exhibits significant financial volatility and concerning spending patterns. In 2023, the organization reported revenue of $11,478 against expenses of $3,091,270, indicating a substantial deficit. This trend of expenses far exceeding revenue is consistent across multiple years, such as 2022 ($11,579 revenue vs. $214,141 expenses) and 2020 ($4,023 revenue vs. $214,333 expenses). While the organization holds substantial assets, reported at $10,017,420 in 2023, the consistent and large operational deficits raise questions about the sustainability of its financial model and the source of funding for its expenditures. The lack of reported officer compensation across all filings suggests a volunteer-led or externally managed structure, which can be a positive for efficiency, but the overall financial health is precarious given the revenue-expense imbalance. The organization's spending efficiency is difficult to assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which is not provided in the summary data. However, the sheer scale of expenses relative to the minimal revenue in recent years suggests that the organization is either drawing heavily from its asset base or relying on undisclosed funding sources to cover its operational costs. This lack of clarity on how expenses are categorized and funded, especially with such low reported revenue, impacts transparency. The consistent reporting of $1 in liabilities in recent years is unusual and warrants further investigation to understand the true financial obligations. Overall, the financial data presents a picture of an organization with significant assets but a highly unstable operational funding model. The large and consistent deficits, coupled with minimal reported revenue, raise concerns about long-term viability and the true nature of its financial activities. While the absence of officer compensation is a positive, the broader financial picture suggests a need for greater transparency regarding funding sources and expenditure allocation to properly evaluate its financial health and efficiency.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages