Inconsistent revenue streams, leading to significant year-over-year fluctuations (e.g., $441,580 in 2020 vs. $176,592 in 2021)
Strengths
Zero executive compensation reported across all filings, indicating efficient use of funds at the leadership level.
Consistent growth in net assets over the past decade, reaching $1,733,001 in 2023.
Strong financial transparency with 14 IRS 990 filings available.
Spending Breakdown
How Strategic Community Investments allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Strategic Community Investments
Is Strategic Community Investments a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Strategic Community Investments (EIN: 203188701) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Strategic Community Investments a good charity to donate to?
Strategic Community Investments has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $416K. Assets: $1.9M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Strategic Community Investments?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Strategic Community Investments is 203188701. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Strategic Community Investments spend its money?
Strategic Community Investments allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Strategic Community Investments's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Strategic Community Investments's tax-exempt status using EIN 203188701 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Strategic Community Investments demonstrates a generally stable financial position with consistent asset growth over the past several years, reaching $1,733,001 in 2023. However, the organization has frequently operated at a deficit, with expenses exceeding revenue in 2023 ($236,606 expenses vs. $172,088 revenue), 2022 ($306,777 expenses vs. $318,667 revenue, a small surplus), 2021 ($253,286 expenses vs. $176,592 revenue), and other periods. This pattern of spending more than it brings in, while not immediately critical due to substantial assets, warrants close monitoring to ensure long-term sustainability.
The organization's transparency is bolstered by its consistent filing history, with 14 filings available. A notable strength is the reported 0% officer compensation across all available filings, indicating that executive leadership is not drawing a salary from the organization, which is a strong positive for donor confidence and efficient use of funds. Without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, a precise assessment of spending efficiency is challenging, but the absence of executive compensation suggests a lean operational structure at the top.
While the organization maintains healthy assets, the recurring operational deficits suggest a potential reliance on reserves or inconsistent funding streams. Donors should consider the long-term implications of these deficits, even with the positive aspect of no executive compensation. Further detail on how expenses are allocated would provide a clearer picture of program efficiency and overall financial health.