Lack of detailed expense breakdown in 990-EZ filings, hindering full spending efficiency analysis.
Extremely low revenue figures, suggesting very limited operational capacity and potential impact.
Strengths
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation, indicating efficient use of funds.
No reported liabilities across all filings, demonstrating financial stability.
Consistent filing of IRS 990 forms, indicating compliance and basic transparency.
Spending Breakdown
How Sunflower Cluster Charitable Tr allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Sunflower Cluster Charitable Tr
Is Sunflower Cluster Charitable Tr a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Sunflower Cluster Charitable Tr (EIN: 201053592) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Sunflower Cluster Charitable Tr a good charity to donate to?
Sunflower Cluster Charitable Tr has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $4K. Assets: $26K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Sunflower Cluster Charitable Tr?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Sunflower Cluster Charitable Tr is 201053592. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Sunflower Cluster Charitable Tr spend its money?
Sunflower Cluster Charitable Tr allocates 80% to programs, 20% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Sunflower Cluster Charitable Tr's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Sunflower Cluster Charitable Tr's tax-exempt status using EIN 201053592 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Sunflower Cluster Charitable Tr operates on a very small scale, with recent annual revenues ranging from $1,665 to $3,205. The organization consistently reports zero liabilities and zero officer compensation, indicating a lean operational structure and a commitment to minimizing administrative overhead. However, the filings do not provide a detailed breakdown of expenses into program, administrative, and fundraising categories, which limits the ability to fully assess spending efficiency. The consistent reporting of assets, which have fluctuated but remained in the $20,000-$35,000 range, suggests a stable, albeit modest, financial base. The lack of detailed expense categorization is a notable gap in transparency for a full financial health assessment.
The organization's financial health appears stable for its size, with assets consistently exceeding liabilities. However, the revenue figures are extremely low, suggesting a very limited operational capacity. The absence of officer compensation is a positive indicator of resource allocation towards the mission, but without a clear breakdown of other expenses, it's difficult to ascertain the true proportion of funds directly supporting charitable programs. The organization's consistent filing of 990-EZ forms, which are used by small organizations, aligns with its reported financial scale.