Is Sutaruk Foundation Legit?

Spending Breakdown

How Sutaruk Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

70%

Program Spending

Below average — room for improvement

20%

Admin Costs

Reasonable — admin costs in check

10%

Fundraising

Within typical range

How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Sutaruk Foundation

Is Sutaruk Foundation a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Sutaruk Foundation (EIN: 113673305) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 45/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.

Is Sutaruk Foundation a good charity to donate to?

Sutaruk Foundation has a Mission Score of 45/100. Revenue: $1.8M. Assets: $1.3M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Sutaruk Foundation?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Sutaruk Foundation is 113673305. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Sutaruk Foundation spend its money?

Sutaruk Foundation allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Sutaruk Foundation's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Sutaruk Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 113673305 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

The Sutaruk Foundation exhibits a concerning financial trend, consistently spending significantly more than it generates in revenue. For instance, in 2023, the organization reported revenue of $52,256 against expenses of $289,013, indicating a substantial deficit. This pattern is not isolated, as evidenced by similar disparities in prior years, such as 2022 (Revenue: $35,850, Expenses: $220,299) and 2021 (Revenue: $23,639, Expenses: $201,646). This operational model has led to a steady decline in assets over the past decade, from $3,367,132 in 2011 to $1,022,408 in 2023. While the organization reports 0% officer compensation across all filings, which is a positive indicator of executive cost control, the overall financial sustainability is questionable given the persistent revenue-expense gap.

The foundation's transparency is generally good, with consistent filing of IRS Form 990s. However, the lack of detailed expense breakdowns in the provided data makes it difficult to fully assess spending efficiency beyond the top-line figures. The NTEE code T20 (Philanthropy, Voluntarism, and Grantmaking Foundations) suggests its primary activity is grantmaking, but without specific program spending data, it's challenging to determine the direct impact of its expenditures. The consistent decline in assets suggests that the foundation is drawing down its endowment to cover operational costs and grants, which is not a sustainable long-term strategy without a significant increase in revenue generation.

Verdict: Sutaruk Foundation shows mixed signals

Red Flags

Strengths