Expenses ($42,776) exceeded revenue ($30,514) in the latest filing period, indicating a deficit.
Strengths
No officer compensation reported, indicating efficient use of funds.
No reported liabilities, suggesting a healthy balance sheet for its size.
Strong program focus implied by NTEE code and lack of executive compensation.
Spending Breakdown
How Sycamore Canyon Conservationfoundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Sycamore Canyon Conservationfoundation
Is Sycamore Canyon Conservationfoundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Sycamore Canyon Conservationfoundation (EIN: 205391377) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 1 red flag identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Sycamore Canyon Conservationfoundation a good charity to donate to?
Sycamore Canyon Conservationfoundation has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $31K. Assets: $49K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Sycamore Canyon Conservationfoundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Sycamore Canyon Conservationfoundation is 205391377. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Sycamore Canyon Conservationfoundation spend its money?
Sycamore Canyon Conservationfoundation allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Sycamore Canyon Conservationfoundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Sycamore Canyon Conservationfoundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 205391377 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Sycamore Canyon Conservationfoundation appears to be a very small, nascent organization with limited financial activity. In its latest filing (202306), the organization reported revenue of $30,514 and expenses of $42,776, indicating a deficit for the period. Its assets stood at $41,349 with no reported liabilities, suggesting a relatively stable, albeit small, balance sheet. The absence of officer compensation reported in the filing is a positive indicator of efficient use of funds, especially for an organization of this size. Given its early stage and minimal financial footprint, a detailed analysis of spending efficiency is challenging without more granular expense data, but the lack of executive compensation is a strong point for transparency and resource allocation.