How Teammates Mentoring Program allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Teammates Mentoring Program
Is Teammates Mentoring Program a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Teammates Mentoring Program (EIN: 208380817) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 0 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Teammates Mentoring Program a good charity to donate to?
Teammates Mentoring Program has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $67K. Assets: $111K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Teammates Mentoring Program?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Teammates Mentoring Program is 208380817. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Teammates Mentoring Program spend its money?
Teammates Mentoring Program allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Teammates Mentoring Program's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Teammates Mentoring Program's tax-exempt status using EIN 208380817 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Teammates Mentoring Program appears to be in a stable financial position based on its latest available IRS 990 data. With revenue of $65,316 and expenses of $32,106 in the 202106 period, the organization generated a surplus, indicating sound financial management. Its assets of $111,350 with zero liabilities further reinforce a healthy balance sheet, suggesting good stewardship of resources. The organization's NTEE code O30 indicates a focus on mentoring, which aligns with its name and mission. The absence of reported officer compensation in the 202106 filing suggests either a volunteer-led executive team or compensation below reporting thresholds, which can be a positive indicator for donor confidence regarding resource allocation directly to programs.
While the provided data is limited to a single filing, the financial indicators suggest efficiency in operations, as expenses are significantly lower than revenue. This surplus could be reinvested into program expansion or building reserves. The lack of specific breakdowns for program, administrative, and fundraising expenses in the provided summary prevents a detailed analysis of spending efficiency, but the overall financial health appears robust. Transparency is generally good with public 990 filings, and the clear financial position with no liabilities is a positive sign.