How The Commission On Massage Therapy Accreditation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about The Commission On Massage Therapy Accreditation
Is The Commission On Massage Therapy Accreditation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, The Commission On Massage Therapy Accreditation (EIN: 200798736) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 90/100. 0 red flags identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is The Commission On Massage Therapy Accreditation a good charity to donate to?
The Commission On Massage Therapy Accreditation has a Mission Score of 90/100. Revenue: $261K. Assets: $544K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for The Commission On Massage Therapy Accreditation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for The Commission On Massage Therapy Accreditation is 200798736. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does The Commission On Massage Therapy Accreditation spend its money?
The Commission On Massage Therapy Accreditation allocates 85% to programs, 15% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify The Commission On Massage Therapy Accreditation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify The Commission On Massage Therapy Accreditation's tax-exempt status using EIN 200798736 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Commission On Massage Therapy Accreditation (COMTA) demonstrates consistent financial stability with a healthy asset base relative to its annual revenue. In the latest filing (Period 202402), COMTA reported revenues of $261,512 against expenses of $247,234, resulting in a surplus. Its assets have shown a positive trend, growing from $319,873 in 2020 to $595,071 in 2024, indicating sound financial management and accumulation of reserves. The organization consistently reports 0% officer compensation, which is a strong indicator of efficient spending on administrative overhead and a commitment to directing funds towards its mission.
COMTA's spending efficiency appears strong, particularly given the absence of reported officer compensation. While a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses isn't explicitly provided in the summary data, the consistent surpluses and asset growth suggest that the organization is managing its resources effectively. The NTEE code B024 (Professional Societies, Associations) suggests its primary activities are likely related to accreditation and professional standards, which inherently involve administrative functions.
Transparency is high, as evidenced by the consistent filing of IRS Form 990s over many years. The 0% officer compensation is a notable positive for transparency and public trust, as it indicates that the organization's leadership is either volunteer-based or compensated through other means not classified as officer compensation, which would require further investigation of the full 990 form for complete clarity. Overall, COMTA appears to be a financially sound and efficiently managed organization.