Is The Door A Center Of Alternatives Inc Legit?

Quick charity verification for The Door A Center Of Alternatives Inc (EIN: 136127348)

Verdict: The Door A Center Of Alternatives Inc appears trustworthy

70/100Mission Score
$43.7MRevenue
$57.1MAssets
4Red Flags
4Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

Spending Breakdown

How The Door A Center Of Alternatives Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about The Door A Center Of Alternatives Inc

Is The Door A Center Of Alternatives Inc a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, The Door A Center Of Alternatives Inc (EIN: 136127348) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 4 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.

Is The Door A Center Of Alternatives Inc a good charity to donate to?

The Door A Center Of Alternatives Inc has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $43.7M. Assets: $57.1M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for The Door A Center Of Alternatives Inc?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for The Door A Center Of Alternatives Inc is 136127348. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does The Door A Center Of Alternatives Inc spend its money?

The Door A Center Of Alternatives Inc allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify The Door A Center Of Alternatives Inc's tax-exempt status?

You can verify The Door A Center Of Alternatives Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 136127348 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

The Door A Center Of Alternatives Inc demonstrates a generally stable financial position with significant assets, though its revenue and expenses have shown considerable fluctuation over the past few years. For instance, in fiscal year 2021, the organization reported expenses of $50,995,736 against revenues of $31,098,431, indicating a substantial deficit. This was followed by a strong surplus in 2022 with revenues of $41,073,710 exceeding expenses of $33,271,686, and then another deficit in 2023 where expenses ($33,890,273) again outstripped revenues ($29,186,860). The organization maintains a healthy asset base, with assets consistently above $50 million, reaching $57,144,559 in the latest filing, which provides a buffer against operational deficits. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings suggests either that executive compensation is not reported in this specific field or that it is exceptionally low, which could be a positive indicator of resource allocation to programs, but warrants further investigation for clarity on executive pay practices. Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses within the provided data. However, the recurring operational deficits in recent years (2023, 2021, 2020, 2019) suggest that the organization's expenses sometimes exceed its incoming revenue, which could impact long-term sustainability if not managed effectively. The significant increase in liabilities in 2021 to over $20 million, compared to previous years, is also noteworthy, though it decreased substantially in subsequent years. The lack of reported officer compensation in the provided data makes it challenging to evaluate executive pay transparency directly from this summary, but the consistent reporting of 0% in that field across all filings is unusual and might indicate a reporting nuance rather than an actual absence of compensation. Overall, while the organization has a strong asset base and has demonstrated periods of robust revenue generation, the fluctuating financial performance and recurring deficits in recent years warrant careful monitoring. The absence of reported officer compensation in the provided data is a point of ambiguity regarding transparency that would benefit from further clarification.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages