Is The Earl And Elizabeth Ash Foundation Attn Scott Gunderson Legit?
Quick charity verification for The Earl And Elizabeth Ash Foundation Attn Scott Gunderson (EIN: 141841243)
Verdict: The Earl And Elizabeth Ash Foundation Attn Scott Gunderson shows mixed signals
65/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
3Red Flags
2Strengths
Red Flags
Consistent deficit spending, with expenses exceeding revenue in all reported periods (e.g., 2015 expenses of $442,788 vs. revenue of $266,691).
Significant decline in assets over time, from $4,718,317 in 2011 to $4,104,385 in 2015, indicating reliance on endowment for operations.
Latest filing shows $0 in both revenue and assets, suggesting potential inactivity or dissolution without clear explanation in the provided data.
Strengths
Consistent IRS 990 filing history, indicating good transparency in reporting.
0% officer compensation reported across all filings, suggesting efficient use of funds by not paying executive salaries.
Spending Breakdown
How The Earl And Elizabeth Ash Foundation Attn Scott Gunderson allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about The Earl And Elizabeth Ash Foundation Attn Scott Gunderson
Is The Earl And Elizabeth Ash Foundation Attn Scott Gunderson a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, The Earl And Elizabeth Ash Foundation Attn Scott Gunderson (EIN: 141841243) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is The Earl And Elizabeth Ash Foundation Attn Scott Gunderson a good charity to donate to?
The Earl And Elizabeth Ash Foundation Attn Scott Gunderson has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for The Earl And Elizabeth Ash Foundation Attn Scott Gunderson?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for The Earl And Elizabeth Ash Foundation Attn Scott Gunderson is 141841243. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does The Earl And Elizabeth Ash Foundation Attn Scott Gunderson spend its money?
The Earl And Elizabeth Ash Foundation Attn Scott Gunderson allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify The Earl And Elizabeth Ash Foundation Attn Scott Gunderson's tax-exempt status?
You can verify The Earl And Elizabeth Ash Foundation Attn Scott Gunderson's tax-exempt status using EIN 141841243 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Earl And Elizabeth Ash Foundation appears to be a private foundation, as indicated by its consistent asset base and revenue primarily from investments, rather than public contributions. The organization consistently spends more than it brings in through revenue, with expenses exceeding revenue in all reported periods. For example, in 2015, expenses were $442,788 against revenues of $266,691. This trend suggests the foundation is drawing down its assets over time, as evidenced by the decline from $4,718,317 in assets in 2011 to $4,104,385 in 2015. The latest filing shows $0 in revenue and assets, which could indicate a significant change in status or a final dissolution, requiring further investigation beyond the provided data.
Regarding spending efficiency, without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, it's difficult to fully assess. However, the consistent deficit spending suggests that the foundation's operational model relies on its endowment rather than generating sufficient annual income to cover expenses. The absence of officer compensation in all reported periods is a positive indicator for efficiency in that specific area. The transparency of the organization is generally good, as it has a consistent filing history with the IRS 990 forms, which are publicly accessible documents.
The significant drop to $0 in both revenue and assets in the latest period is a critical point that warrants further scrutiny. This could represent the final stages of the foundation's operations or a reporting anomaly. Without more recent data or context, it's challenging to provide a definitive assessment of its current financial health, but the historical trend shows a foundation that was systematically distributing more than its annual income.