Long-standing presence and established financial operations
Spending Breakdown
How The Foundation For Enhancing Communities allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about The Foundation For Enhancing Communities
Is The Foundation For Enhancing Communities a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, The Foundation For Enhancing Communities (EIN: 10564355) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 80/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is The Foundation For Enhancing Communities a good charity to donate to?
The Foundation For Enhancing Communities has a Mission Score of 80/100. Revenue: $21.6M. Assets: $142.0M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for The Foundation For Enhancing Communities?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for The Foundation For Enhancing Communities is 10564355. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does The Foundation For Enhancing Communities spend its money?
The Foundation For Enhancing Communities allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify The Foundation For Enhancing Communities's tax-exempt status?
You can verify The Foundation For Enhancing Communities's tax-exempt status using EIN 10564355 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Foundation For Enhancing Communities (TFEC) demonstrates a strong financial position with substantial and growing assets, reaching $120,074,104 in the latest filing period (202312). Revenue has fluctuated significantly, from a high of $47,434,480 in 202212 to $6,321,119 in 202312, which is typical for community foundations that receive large, infrequent contributions. Despite these fluctuations, the organization consistently maintains a healthy asset base relative to its annual expenses. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings suggests that executive salaries are either not reported in this section or are covered by other means, which could be a point for further inquiry regarding transparency in compensation practices.
Spending efficiency appears generally sound, with expenses typically well-managed relative to revenue and assets. For instance, in 202312, expenses were $12,415,926 against $6,321,119 in revenue, indicating a period of higher grantmaking or operational investment, potentially drawing from prior year contributions or investment returns. The organization's primary function as a community foundation involves distributing grants, which would be categorized as program spending. Without a detailed breakdown of functional expenses (program, administrative, fundraising) from the provided data, a precise efficiency ratio is difficult to ascertain, but the overall financial health appears robust. The consistent filing history and asset growth indicate a stable and well-established organization.