Expenses frequently exceeded revenue in prior years (e.g., 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012), leading to asset depletion.
Strengths
Consistently reports 0% officer compensation, indicating efficient use of funds for leadership.
Maintained operations for several years despite financial fluctuations.
Spending Breakdown
How The Institute For Watershed Science Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about The Institute For Watershed Science Inc
Is The Institute For Watershed Science Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, The Institute For Watershed Science Inc (EIN: 205399906) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 2 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is The Institute For Watershed Science Inc a good charity to donate to?
The Institute For Watershed Science Inc has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for The Institute For Watershed Science Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for The Institute For Watershed Science Inc is 205399906. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does The Institute For Watershed Science Inc spend its money?
The Institute For Watershed Science Inc allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify The Institute For Watershed Science Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify The Institute For Watershed Science Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 205399906 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Institute For Watershed Science Inc appears to be a very small organization with fluctuating financial activity. Over its filing history, revenue has ranged from $47,341 to $115,901, and expenses have often exceeded revenue, leading to periods of asset depletion. For example, in 2015, expenses of $82,905 significantly outstripped revenue of $67,922. The latest filing shows $0 in both revenue and assets, which could indicate dormancy or a significant operational change. The organization consistently reports 0% officer compensation, which is a positive sign for resource allocation directly to its mission. However, the lack of recent financial activity and the small scale of operations make a robust assessment of spending efficiency challenging without more detailed program expense breakdowns.