Is The Robertson Scholars Leadership Program Legit?
Quick charity verification for The Robertson Scholars Leadership Program (EIN: 202479103)
Verdict: The Robertson Scholars Leadership Program appears trustworthy
90/100Mission Score
$9.2MRevenue
$103KAssets
2Red Flags
4Strengths
Red Flags
Extremely low asset base relative to annual revenue, which could indicate a lack of financial reserves or a complex financial structure not fully transparent in these filings.
Consistent $1 liability reported across multiple years, which is unusual and may mask the true financial obligations or indicate a specific accounting practice.
Strengths
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation, indicating high efficiency in leadership costs or external funding for leadership.
Expenses consistently align very closely with revenue, suggesting a high percentage of funds are directly used for program delivery.
Stable financial operations with consistent revenue and expense levels over more than a decade.
Strong program focus implied by the tight revenue-expense correlation and lack of significant asset accumulation.
Spending Breakdown
How The Robertson Scholars Leadership Program allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
95%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
3%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
2%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about The Robertson Scholars Leadership Program
Is The Robertson Scholars Leadership Program a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, The Robertson Scholars Leadership Program (EIN: 202479103) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 90/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is The Robertson Scholars Leadership Program a good charity to donate to?
The Robertson Scholars Leadership Program has a Mission Score of 90/100. Revenue: $9.2M. Assets: $103K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for The Robertson Scholars Leadership Program?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for The Robertson Scholars Leadership Program is 202479103. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does The Robertson Scholars Leadership Program spend its money?
The Robertson Scholars Leadership Program allocates 95% to programs, 3% to administration, and 2% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify The Robertson Scholars Leadership Program's tax-exempt status?
You can verify The Robertson Scholars Leadership Program's tax-exempt status using EIN 202479103 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Robertson Scholars Leadership Program demonstrates consistent financial activity with revenues closely matching expenses across all reported periods, indicating a stable operational model. For instance, in 2023, revenue was $9,018,945 against expenses of $9,022,046. The organization consistently reports minimal assets and liabilities, often just $1 for liabilities, which could suggest that significant assets are held by a related entity or that the program operates primarily as a pass-through for funds. This structure, while not inherently problematic, warrants further investigation to fully understand the financial ecosystem.
The program's spending efficiency appears high, given the tight correlation between revenue and expenses, implying that most incoming funds are directly deployed for program activities. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings is a significant positive indicator for spending efficiency and donor trust, as it suggests that leadership is either unpaid or compensated through a related entity, which would need to be clarified for complete transparency. However, the very low asset base relative to its annual revenue (e.g., $3,650 in assets against $9 million in revenue in 2023) is unusual for an organization of this scale and could indicate a reliance on external funding sources or a unique operational structure where assets are not directly held by this specific EIN.
Transparency is generally good with consistent 990 filings. However, the minimal asset base and the 0% officer compensation, while positive on the surface, raise questions about the full financial picture and how the program's operations are truly funded and managed. A deeper dive into related organizations or specific program agreements would be necessary to fully assess the financial health and transparency beyond the immediate 990 data.